<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live &#8211; &quot;no pagination&quot; &#8211; best feature gone!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.techprofound.com/2006/09/10/windows-live-no-pagination-best-feature-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.techprofound.com/2006/09/10/windows-live-no-pagination-best-feature-gone/</link>
	<description>geek w/ social skillz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Microsoft goes Live with search, gets sexier, drops extraneous Windows</title>
		<link>http://blog.techprofound.com/2006/09/10/windows-live-no-pagination-best-feature-gone/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Microsoft goes Live with search, gets sexier, drops extraneous Windows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tweblog.wordpress.com/2006/09/10/windows-live-no-pagination-best-feature-gone/#comment-201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] They are treating some of our newer websites better than Google, but are nowhere on the map as far as traffic for our busier, more established sites. Also noticed they dropped the neverending scrollbars to eliminate pagination which annoyed at least one beta tester. Would be nice to see that feature at least being an option. Wendy over at Lifehacker is running a poll asking: do you or will you use Live search? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They are treating some of our newer websites better than Google, but are nowhere on the map as far as traffic for our busier, more established sites. Also noticed they dropped the neverending scrollbars to eliminate pagination which annoyed at least one beta tester. Would be nice to see that feature at least being an option. Wendy over at Lifehacker is running a poll asking: do you or will you use Live search? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

